• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Random Thoughts or Whatever

Pretty much what you described is called discipline. I too have plenty of things I don't need, but we all know plenty of those that the other 2 statements apply to.

Ran across a quote the other day...can't remember where/by whom that went something like this:

"People judge other people for not who they are, but more so for the 'things' that they own.

Reaction?

Q
 
"People judge other people for not who they are, but more so for the 'things' that they own.

Sure, because getting to know people takes a lot of time and effort and opportunity. OTOH, seeing what they wear or drive or where they live takes a few seconds. Usually, the "knowing process" moves along over time in gradual steps. Doesn't it?

Story
I met a guy in the woodshop in early January. He was my age, pleasant, and we had a long convo about the various guitars we owned and would like to own. He suggested we meetup, play some guitar together. Yeah sure, why not?

A couple weeks later he arrives at my house. He brought his music, I had mine. We sort of alternated playing our music - joining in with the other if we knew the piece - very informal. It seemed to be fun and casual, but he seemed a bit formal, or tight. Then, as he's leaving he turns at the door, and says flatly to me, "Well, of all the times I have played guitar with other people....this has been the most recent," and walks to his car.

Uh, ok then.
 
Ran across a quote the other day...can't remember where/by whom that went something like this:

"People judge other people for not who they are, but more so for the 'things' that they own.

Reaction?

Q

I generally don't need people like that as friends.

There may be the rare exception, but that's probably a sign that I don't want to hang out with them.

Now, there is something to be said, for looking out for people who make stupid buying decisions, over and over. They can wind up being a black hole, should they be a friend. Some of them can be helped, but some can just test the limits of hospitality and empathy.

Regards,
Gordon.
 
Ran across a quote the other day...can't remember where/by whom that went something like this:

"People judge other people for not who they are, but more so for the 'things' that they own.

Reaction?

Q
That's multifaceted. Some people might judge others based on wealth and extragance or lack there of, approving or disapproving. Then, there are the types of things a person owns, how many things, how many of the same kind and different kinds of things. The list goes on.

I prefer to get to know an individual. However, I often notice things they own and the quality level. This gives insight to what's important to a person and whether or not the person knows which products are quality. It often reveals the person's wisdom too. For instance, if I see a poor person who owns a high end power bank and an adequate charger for it, NOT a phone/wall charger, I know that this person knows what's what and understands the meaning of "can't afford to buy cheap".
Sure, because getting to know people takes a lot of time and effort and opportunity. OTOH, seeing what they wear or drive or where they live takes a few seconds. Usually, the "knowing process" moves along over time in gradual steps. Doesn't it?

Story
I met a guy in the woodshop in early January. He was my age, pleasant, and we had a long convo about the various guitars we owned and would like to own. He suggested we meetup, play some guitar together. Yeah sure, why not?

A couple weeks later he arrives at my house. He brought his music, I had mine. We sort of alternated playing our music - joining in with the other if we knew the piece - very informal. It seemed to be fun and casual, but he seemed a bit formal, or tight. Then, as he's leaving he turns at the door, and says flatly to me, "Well, of all the times I have played guitar with other people....this has been the most recent," and walks to his car.

Uh, ok then.
What a person owns might tell you something of value. A person who is all about being flashy and superficial is probably not someone I wanna meet.

The line about "most recent" sounds like his his failed attempt at humor.
Now, there is something to be said, for looking out for people who make stupid buying decisions, over and over. They can wind up being a black hole, should they be a friend. Some of them can be helped, but some can just test the limits of hospitality and empathy.
Yes, some people will buy things on impulse that don't make sense for them, are cheaply made and have to be replaced often and they find themselves in debt, barrow, barrow more....
 
Ok I am not trying to stir up anything here, and I hope it doesn’t. I have heard some different opinions on these. Some saying conspiracy theories. Is there someone on this site that could explain these to me. I took these pictures 5 days apart. I don’t understand why these planes or jets would be traveling in these types of patterns lately. What causes these trails? Is it the air temperature? Is it the type of fuel? I sincerely don’t know. I have not seen these in a long time, but now they have been frequent. I am sure there is someone on here that is in aviation that probably knows. Thanks.
If you want to spend the time and effort, I think you could look at a real time flight tracker and see what flights are producing them.
 
A random thought....

Everyone agrees that there is always noise in the signal, right?
Well, what if the noise is the signal?
One of the tenets of digital coding of signals is using predictive methods and then sending only the deviation of the source from the prediction. The better the prediction, the more efficient the transmission, and the more the transmitted signal looks like random noise.
 
Random thought today: If you're human, you've got a 'skeleton' in your 'cage' ". Which is normal. :bigok:

And it's been pointed out to me in the past, it's the number and how big the "skeleton(s)" is/are that really counts!


Q
I've got a skull beneath the skin.


At 0:48 the lead solo, rhythm guitar line and bass line are all incredible. The lead solo ends and the rhythm and bass continue.
 
From GROK

"Medical / body-snatching connection — Before the UK's Anatomy Act of 1832, there was a severe shortage of legal corpses for medical study and dissection. Doctors and medical students sometimes resorted to illegally obtained bodies (via "resurrection men" or body snatchers). They would hide skeletons (or bodies that decomposed into skeletons) in cupboards/closets because openly displaying them was socially unacceptable or suspicious. This literal hidden skeleton became a metaphor for shameful secrets."
 
From GROK

"Medical / body-snatching connection — Before the UK's Anatomy Act of 1832, there was a severe shortage of legal corpses for medical study and dissection. Doctors and medical students sometimes resorted to illegally obtained bodies (via "resurrection men" or body snatchers). They would hide skeletons (or bodies that decomposed into skeletons) in cupboards/closets because openly displaying them was socially unacceptable or suspicious. This literal hidden skeleton became a metaphor for shameful secrets."
As Arty Johnson from "Laugh In" used to remark..."Verrrry Interesting! But gory!"


Q
 
Random thought of yesterday:
Regarding shameful secrets. If it turns out that we are simply living in a computer simulation (about a 50-50 chance according to some experts) "shame" would be a meaningless concept--so nothing to worry about!
 
Random thought of yesterday:
Regarding shameful secrets. If it turns out that we are simply living in a computer simulation (about a 50-50 chance according to some experts) "shame" would be a meaningless concept--so nothing to worry about!

Isn't that the foundational concern, approaching worry, that Hawking had about AI and related uncontrolled advances in computers?

Q
 
Last edited:
Random thought of yesterday:
Regarding shameful secrets. If it turns out that we are simply living in a computer simulation (about a 50-50 chance according to some experts) "shame" would be a meaningless concept--so nothing to worry about!
Isn't that the foundational concern, approaching worry, that Hawking had about AI and related uncontrolled advances in computers?

Q
There is no sense worrying about it. Whatever is going on will be revealed in time. Worrying won't change the outcome one iota.
 
Random thought today: If you're human, you've got a 'skeleton' in your 'cage' ". Which is normal. :bigok:

And it's been pointed out to me in the past, it's the number and how big the "skeleton(s)" is/are that really counts!


Q
Someone asked me, "What really is the meaning of Life?'

"Hmm... let's find out." I reached down deep in my pocket. Fingers searching for the Truth. I came up with a piece of blue lint.

:idea:
 
Last edited:
Someone asked me, "What really is the meaning of Life?'

"Hmm... let's find out." I reached down deep in my pocket. Fingers searching for the Truth. I came up with a piece of blue lint.

:idea:
I saw the commercials for life back in the 70s. I picked up a box of cinnamon Life in the store and read the ingredients. Bought it and had a bowl every morning as part of my breakfast. Very meaningful. ;)
 
Random thought of yesterday:
Regarding shameful secrets. If it turns out that we are simply living in a computer simulation (about a 50-50 chance according to some experts) "shame" would be a meaningless concept--so nothing to worry about!
But, what if you’re the main character in the simulation and don’t know it? You could be really throwing off their data by being a dork.
:rockon:
 
Back
Top Bottom