• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Really big speaker ID

Agreed on the xxover pics.

What an exciting find. Have you confirmed all drivers work?

Kudos on a very promising find!!

Speaker seems trebble heavy at the moment with recessed mids/lows. My guess is the no surrounds are causing the isssue. Is this normal for a speaker with bad surrounds.
 
You should only being playing them at a level high enough to just confirm that each driver is working. Very low. You can damage the voice coils of the drivers playing them at any sort of significant volume.

Yes playing them with bad surrounds will/can effect the sound.
 
Yea i didnt play em loud. I know very well not to play speakers with out surrounds. There coming apart tomorrow. To be honest i think i bit off more then i can chew. Ive rebuilt dynacos a25 and klh 17. But this is on a whole different level.
 
Actually the crossover looks like a one-off (or two-off). Handwritten markings and the use of a barrier strip like that are not common on commercially-built speakers. Maybe this was a prototype that never got into production.
 
Actually the crossover looks like a one-off (or two-off). Handwritten markings and the use of a barrier strip like that are not common on commercially-built speakers. Maybe this was a prototype that never got into production.
You could be right but many commercially made older speakers have writing on them. Some xo's are signed or initialed by the guy who made them and symbols and things written on the boards.

If they are home made the effort that went into the cabinet is amazing. The tweeter array, the time aligned mids and woofer section, nice veneer, look like they have decent heft...Very cool speakers.
 
You could be right but many commercially made older speakers have writing on them. Some xo's are signed or initialed by the guy who made them and symbols and things written on the boards.
I have certainly seen handwritten markings to identify a particular lot, or tester, or even a date. But marking each terminal like that, which would be the same on every crossover produced, would be a waste of effort (and these aren't even that old - I'm guessing mid-70s at the earliest). And it doesn't seem high-end enough to be a limited run - they look like higher-end mass market speakers.
If they are home made the effort that went into the cabinet is amazing. The tweeter array, the time aligned mids and woofer section, nice veneer, look like they have decent heft...Very cool speakers.
Not to mention the compound angles on the front baffle.

Agreed, it seems extremely unlikely to me that these were homebuilt, which is why I suggested that they might be prototypes. I also see hot glue used on the crossover, which I don't think was all that common in the home back then.
 
Last edited:
I dont know what the hell I bought but I know for a fact my entire man cave is going to have to be rearranged just for these. Why did i buy these??
-My test facility
View attachment 703724


To think that with these big cabinets they would put binding posts

View attachment 703725

A lot of good speakers in the 70s and 80s got pretty chintzy connection systems. Worst case, get some binding post cups and cut a large hole to fit them.
 
I don't see any ports on those speakers. If this the case, you have a set of acoustic suspension speakers. If that is what they are, then, until you replace all surrounds, you will not hear what they are supposed to sound like.
 
Agreed, it seems extremely unlikely to me that these were homebuilt, which is why I suggested that they might be prototypes. I also see hot glue used on the crossover, which I don't think was all that common in the home back then.

Im going to agree with you as well these must of been prototypes. May of never of even made it out of the factory and a employe took them home.
 
The label looks the same, what does it say? Could have been a later replacement that had a different basket, but otherwise the same. The magnet and cone certainly look similar.
 
Same specs on stickers. Almost the same ohms by .2 of a ohm. The basket is different. Im thinking that this is a problem.
20160315_220524.jpg
 
You're thinking wrong.

Really its fine??? The cones and the dust cap are the same. Spider is slightly different and It appears to have the same tension as the other spiders. Its an OCD sort of thing where I would like matching drivers.
However abit of reaseach found what became of the marsland linear B speakers. They became Mcbride linear B (the mix match driver says mcbride/marsland)

No affli I think this is the modern version of this driver

http://qcomponents.ca/McBride-LINEAR-B-12.0.html
 
IF the cone and spiders look the same, and the driver came from the successor company, its probably the recommended or closest replacement they could use. In this case, this might be the best compromise you can come up with, short of searching Ebay for a used replacement. Driver frames may "look" different, but if the frame dimensions are the same where it counts - spider circumference, magnetic gap width and height and position, surround landing/mounting, and magnetic strength, it matters not that the frame itself looks or is shaped different.

The newest driver is not likely to have the same parameters, and certainly won't look the same as your old drivers. You would likely have to get some type of woofer tester to check the Thiel/Small parameters, and that's a whole lot more complicated and money intensive just to satisfy your OCD-ness. I would respectfully suggest reining in your OCD tendencies (and I understand them completely) and stick with these woofers for now and get them refoamed and see how they work and sound together.

As I said, you could always search for them on Ebay and CanuckAudiomart, but good luck, I just checked and nothing showed up under marsland, leigh, or linear b.
 
Last edited:
These speakers look very nice, a little too nice for DIY, but if they are, they were built by someone that took their time. :idea:

Can't wait to read about your thoughts on them after you get them all fixed up.
 
Really its fine??? The cones and the dust cap are the same. Spider is slightly different and It appears to have the same tension as the other spiders.

What matters is the different woofer matches the others acoustically and is somewhat less critical in a dual woofer design.
 
Back
Top Bottom