...Well, these are MV12's - and although they look like the infamous VD1212 types (which I would have changed without a second thought), they are not prone to failure as far as I know, so I am not thinking of changing them.
+1
This is speculation, based on a relatively small sample size, but the MV types do seem to be more robust than the VD types. I now leave the MV types in place unless I know they have failed.
Both Harolda and I have had issues with loosing the ability to adjust voltage there. It just gets stuck at about 9.5v.

And with 2 resistor value changes I can now easily adjust to -11V![]()

May I however ask...
You needed to change resistor values?
Why? Which resistors / which positions? What were the previous values and what are the new values?![]()
I just bought the one on ebay and might aquire another one in a few days and they both need work so I'm keeping a close eye on this thread..I don't think I have any issues with grounding, and pre/post rebuild the voltage available from the 11V regulators was the same. I think Harold was, at least for a time, testing his with the power amp modules absent, this may have caused the grounding anomaly he experienced, mine are installed.
The trimmer was set for 0Ω to achieve the highest (numerical) voltage available, about 10V, so it followed that if I reduced the value of the series resistors, R73 and R74 from 5.6KΩ to 3.9KΩ I could use the reduction in resistance to bring the adjustment in range of the trimmer adjustment. The setting of the trimmer is now around 700Ω - so the total resistance in that chain has gone down by 1KΩ to achieve the correct setting, a current increase of ~0.5mA only in that resistor chain.
It's a bit academic really, providing the voltage is stable and approximately right it won't make a lot of difference. It is the supply for the MC head amps, so in operation if it wasn't actually + / -11V it would just reduce the headroom of the MC head amps a little. However the setup procedure says set for -11V that is what I can now do.
Obviously if I do find some grounding issue, the voltage out of the regulators will presumably then be too high. A sign for me to revisit the situation and reverse the resistor value change, but I don't think that will happen.
I just bought the one on ebay and might aquire another one in a few days and they both need work so I'm keeping a close eye on this thread..
Another X1-er. The more the merrier!

Absolutely, but get ready for one hell of a ride Willy6, my AU-X1 feels like around DOUBLE the work of an AU-919 (or more) - the AU-919 was once described by a very well known AK'er as, and I quote, "A butt-load of work" - I have done two AU-919's, but this AU-X1 is testing me.
My restore in this thread is quite a bit less detailed than Harold's. It is thanks to that thread, and Ron's excellent support there and in this thread, that I can gloss over much of the things going on in the background here. For example, after 5 different parts orders, from 3 different suppliers, I have all the parts for this phase of the restore. The 'can capacitors' will be the second and final phase of this restore, although I can assure you that there will be an extensive 'listening test' before I begin the second phase.[/QUOTE
Hopefully it doesn't arrive in pieces like my g9000 did.
I might consult with you from time to time if you don't mindAbsolutely, but get ready for one hell of a ride Willy6, my AU-X1 feels like around DOUBLE the work of an AU-919 (or more) - the AU-919 was once described by a very well known AK'er as, and I quote, "A butt-load of work" - I have done two AU-919's, but this AU-X1 is testing me.
My restore in this thread is quite a bit less detailed than Harold's. It is thanks to that thread, and Ron's excellent support there and in this thread, that I can gloss over much of the things going on in the background here. For example, after 5 different parts orders, from 3 different suppliers, I have all the parts for this phase of the restore. The 'can capacitors' will be the second and final phase of this restore, although I can assure you that there will be an extensive 'listening test' before I begin the second phase.![]()
I might consult with you from time to time if you don't mind
is the number on the black flags the Pf value?
OK sorryCorrect, always go by what is installed now, use the schematic as a guide for the location of these components. 91pf is a value I encountered in my restore.
NB: Please post questions about your restore on the end of your thread - this is my restore thread- thanks
![]()