• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Would you rather have a Technics SL-1600, SL-1600 mk2, or Pioneer PL-518?

sunvalleylaw

AK Subscriber
Subscriber
I am curious as I am shopping. Would you rather have a Technics SL-1600, SL-1600 mk2, or Pioneer PL-518? And please say why. Thanks!
 
Register to hide this ad
All things being equal (similar condition, reasonably equivalent pricing), I’d take the SL-1600. Mostly because I prefer the front-of-the-unit control setup to the other two. Also, quartz lock, which I wish my JVC had.
 
All things being equal (similar condition, reasonably equivalent pricing), I’d take the SL-1600. Mostly because I prefer the front-of-the-unit control setup to the other two. Also, quartz lock, which I wish my JVC had.
Wanna buy a vowel? The II has the outside the cover controls and is quartz locked. The SL-1600 is servo controlled.

I have a 1600II and had an 1800II so I guess I'm with everyone else, the SL-1600 II is the one to get.
 
Wanna buy a vowel? The II has the outside the cover controls and is quartz locked. The SL-1600 is servo controlled.

I have a 1600II and had an 1800II so I guess I'm with everyone else, the SL-1600 II is the one to get.
Dammit. Yeah, that should have been Sl-1600 Mk II.
 
Another vote for the 1600 MK2 here, for similar reasons to those already mentioned. I've got a 1700 MK2 and worked or owned the other models as well.
 
I prefer the original SL-1600 / SL-1700 version for it's simple and effective arm movement design. IME the SL-1600MkII and SL-700MkII arm movement mechanism is overly complicated and trouble prone. Sometimes it's just the "O" ring, sometimes it's a cracked gear.
 
I have the mkII and just sold 2 sl1700's. I wish I would have kept the 1700 due to its simplicity. My 1600mkII has been a headache since I bought it a year ago.

My $0.02.
 
I prefer the original SL-1600 / SL-1700 version for it's simple and effective arm movement design. IME the SL-1600MkII and SL-700MkII arm movement mechanism is overly complicated and trouble prone. Sometimes it's just the "O" ring, sometimes it's a cracked gear.

I know what you mean. I also like the simple designs of the SL-1300, 1400 and 1500 with no strobe dots.
 
Derailment: I actually like the PL-560 just as much as the SL-1600 if we want to be fair, minus those crappy feet. But, the SL-1600mkii has just more fun features.
 
Not familiar with the Pioneer, but I would also recommend the SL-1600MkII, provided it functions. It may be a headache to fix it if it has problems. The only expected fault that is easy to fix is the tonearm cueing belt that gets loose or snaps. The electronics are a headache.

Additionally, the MkII will most likely require adjustment of the spring loaded feet to make the suspended sub-chasis horizontal again.

If you don't really need an automatic turntable, a 1200MkII would be a great choice as well. Same tonearm, simpler electronics and endless potential for tweaking.
 
The PL-518 is a pretty fair piece that seems to just continue to work. It's a simple and capable unit that sounds quite good with a lot of cartridges that won't break the bank.

Its plinth is also incredibly easy to veneer or just replace altogether. The guts and placards are easy to remove, and building a custom plinth is a relatively easy option (yes, woodworking required).

With a little patience and luck, a PL-518 can be found in good mechanical condition with poor cosmetics for cheap enough (under a hundred) so that someone with the requisite skills could have a really handsome and capable deck for cheap.

Here is one in white oak

pl-518.jpg

prior to logo an dust coverPL-518 woak.jpg

Here is all there is to the plinth. This one is lace wood over a laminated veneer core and just needs to have the innards and feet put on.

pl-518 lace.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom