allmanbros
Well-Known Member
Yes, lots of what ifs here.....another problem with aging longer and raising prices is what happens when/if barrels are readily available and there is no longer a need to use 6 or 7 year old liquid in a bourbon only requiring 4 years......a marketing nightmare to reduce the aging but not lower the price back to what it was before., and distillers aren't in the habit of lowering prices....another consideration is that American oak is not required thus making it possible to get barrels from other types of oak in other countries.........I don't know the answer and your point is certainly viable as any.....oak is the wood required by law, but I know that some experimentation is being done with cherry and other woods....I would think anything other than oak would totally change the taste profile even if the law was changed to allow other woods.....no doubt there has been moves to plant more oak trees, but not an overnight solution....reusing the barrels would definitely change the flavor profile to a much lighter taste and color., not a desirable solution either.If the required “new” oak barrel for bourbon becomes a big factor. Makes sense to age longer this enabling the benefit of selling less juice for the same amounts. Say going from four year to say six, seven.
Changing the wood or reusing barrels this would no longer be a true Bourbon?

