Have you guys seen the demonstration video for the Sutherland TimeLine Strobe Weight?
Its demonstrated on a massive platter belt drive; I'm assuming it to be an upper end table - looks like it, seems like it, blah blah blah, smells like a duck.
He makes a point of showing how he uses a bit of blue tack on the wall to mark the rotational reference point, and makes adjustments such that the strobe mark hits his reference point.
Then he introduces stylus drag by putting the needle down onto the record.
As soon as the needle touches the record, the reference point completely moves rearward, which is expressing stylus drag; and this is just on the run-in groove, without musical impulse effect.
This is shown between 2:40->3:29, if you want to skip to the meat of this example.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF2XieUlzvk
I tried a variation of this with my KAB Speed Strobe mat, and an idler drive with a heavy platter. It's also a very sensitive speed measuring device that easily shows minute speed variations.
In comparing what I saw on the demo video, and what I saw on an idler drive, was like comparing night and day.
The heavy platter belt drive slowed and stayed slow due to stylus drag. The heavy platter idler showed the influence of the needle drop, but immediately self-corrected. It took several drops for me to even realize that there was any sort of speed change anomaly with the idler drive, as it was truly in the small milliseconds of time that it took to self-correct. The belt drive in the demo video never did self-correct, and it was suggested that an adjustment would be necessary at the motors controller, if applicable. To me, this suggests stylus drag to be a very real consideration that belt drives cannot even correct with what appears to be a seriously heavy platter.