• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Random Thoughts or Whatever

I tend to think of & define that/those experience(s) as "immersive", you know, like for example, when a audio systems speakers sonic presence totally disappear.

Thanks for attempting to help clarify/define, spicer, Sir.
Immersive, yes, that is that/those experiences. The right temperature, warmth, is a necessary part of it. You're welcome my friend and thank you for sharing this esoteric bit of audio lore.
 
"tube bloom"

According to the Stereophile dictionary by J. Gordon Holt: "bloom: A quality of expansive richness and warmth, like the live body sound of a cello."
No special category for "tube bloom."
Ref: https://www.stereophile.com/content/sounds-audio-glossary

IMO, words are not sounds. One's sense of sound is bound up in qualia, which really is not shared knowledge. Thus, any words intended to describe sound are based on transmogrification, and aside from serving personal reference points, don't translate well to other brains.

After 50-odd years of hearing people describe sound, I've concluded the value to be roughly nil.
 
I may be an outliner in this group. Hardware is only a mean to produce music (that is the sound, voice, and words) creating a feeling/emotion in me. Whether what I hear is the original or a copy isn't important. Tube or solid state may sound different. That difference has not made much difference in my listening.
 
Last edited:
The air from a fart travels at around 7MPH (Google AI), but the sound of the fart travels at the speed of sound (767 mph at sea level).

I remember a guy in English class having this heated argument with the teacher, that fart sounds were really mini sonic booms.

Anyhow, have a nice Columbus Day!


4d5cc763-ee98-4c3c-a0ed-9e43f8c572d5.gif
 
Last edited:
The obsession we all have to convince others that "Our Sound" is best, or right, or better, or more accurate, is really pointless.
Yes! It's similar to why I like some females more than others. I'm happy with my decisions — I'm not going to try to convince naysayers.

Often, it's just a waste of time. Try to surround yourself with people who support you, not those who constantly cast doubt on you.


fe4d4971-0954-46f1-8951-8511aa3f9704.gif
 
Last edited:
According to the Stereophile dictionary by J. Gordon Holt: "bloom: A quality of expansive richness and warmth, like the live body sound of a cello."
No special category for "tube bloom."
Ref: https://www.stereophile.com/content/sounds-audio-glossary

IMO, words are not sounds. One's sense of sound is bound up in qualia, which really is not shared knowledge. Thus, any words intended to describe sound are based on transmogrification, and aside from serving personal reference points, don't translate well to other brains.

After 50-odd years of hearing people describe sound, I've concluded the value to be roughly nil.
Reminds me of a few things:

When some hi-fi manufacturers paid famous musicians to recommend their product, I laughed - those people will hear the music no matter what it's played through.

Some early phonograph makers quoted people recruited from the general public for hidden A/B tests as saying that the record sounded just like the real performer. I believe it wasn't a lie, but people were discounting the surface noise as not part of the music.

I heard of one radio host with a program of old records who would play a blank record in the background of his announcements, thus creating a constant level of surface noise throughout the program that listeners could easily listen "through."
 
Reminds me of a few things:

When some hi-fi manufacturers paid famous musicians to recommend their product, I laughed - those people will hear the music no matter what it's played through.

Some early phonograph makers quoted people recruited from the general public for hidden A/B tests as saying that the record sounded just like the real performer. I believe it wasn't a lie, but people were discounting the surface noise as not part of the music.

I heard of one radio host with a program of old records who would play a blank record in the background of his announcements, thus creating a constant level of surface noise throughout the program that listeners could easily listen "through."
I suppose that when you pay people to say things, those "things" may not be 100% true. Maybe the more you pay them, the further from 100%.

:idea:
 
Last edited:
The air from a fart travels at around 7MPH (Google AI), but the sound of the fart travels at the speed of sound (767 mph at sea level).

I remember a guy in English class having this heated argument with the teacher, that fart sounds were really mini sonic booms.

Anyhow, have a nice Columbus Day!


4d5cc763-ee98-4c3c-a0ed-9e43f8c572d5.gif
The wife wants a distance of at least 10 ft whenever she suspects I farted :rant:
 
Random thought---

Me dear old Dad (RIP) was shocked when we moved to SoCal in 1961 to see so many houses mounted on sticks hanging over seaside cliffs all over SoCal. "Are these people NUTS? Who the hell would do that? They're all going to fall down someday." Ok, he was off by 65 years, but I guess it's ok to be right, even if it is long after being dead (1972).
 
I read somewhere at a very early age that we never forget anything. I've been able to recall events that I didn't think was possible with enough focus. Some events may take significant time to recall, but they were still rolling around in the gray matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom