i guess the way the 124 is designed you either have to be relatively short or quite long in an arm, no?The time period that I owned an ET II, the 2.5 had already come out. When I spoke with Bruce he was offering the magnesium arm wand as an option for low compliance cartridges, don't recall the carbon fiber being available then. Bruce is one of the great guys in audio, so darn smart, but very polite and unassuming, and very willing to share his knowledge and give advice. What a great guy, and I thought the ET II was a wonderful arm.
I have been considering a SME 309 or IV for my Thorens 124. Been speaking with a longtime SME dealer in the UK about them. Now this dealer relates stories that the IV and V have had slight alterations in sound due to refinements in parts and assembly technique, along with a different wire being used. Now is this gospel according to SME? No, but I have no reason to disbelieve a very respected dealer.
I have only heard the Dynavector arms in passing, and never would claim any experience with them. The systems I heard them in were excellent though. A couple of years ago I considered buying one, as a couple hit Audiogon then. But I dallied a bit and they sold. The Dynavdctor arms still command a substantial price, and are sought after. Not sure if I could fit one on the Thorens though.
Thanks for the post, it was an interesting read.
Regards
Mister Pig
I was another looking at those Dynavector arms at that time, but timing is all and it wasn't my time. How it goes.
I did have a question for you: which of the Schroeder arms were you referring to, what model? I'd love to do a bit more reading on them as I'm not likely to see one in the flesh any time soon and they sure are interesting.
Nice to see all of those interesting possibilities and for me at least the more description of what they are actually like to work with is the best part. I clearly need to get out more....
Last edited:
