So you heard the same regarding those tweeters, what I heard wasn't an uncommon statement? That's a disappointment, I've never heard them, do you like them? I've listened to a lot of KEF but almost all of it has been vintage with the exception of the LS50 so I missed all of that innovation and progression in that interim period of what....30-40 years?
Yeah I get it, it's like every KEF from the era of ferrofluid and beyond is frought with crazy sh*t to correct and design eccentricities. But they sound so damn good it's hard to avoid.
KEF 103/2? Woofer sag.
KEF 105? Woofer sag.
104/2? Tough refoams, ticking timebomb ferrofluid tweeters, ticking time bomb KUBE
KEF 107? Tough refoams, ticking timebomb ferrofluid tweeters, ticking time bomb KUBE
They are like the german car of speakers. Perform stellar when working, horrific when broken. I will advise that if you like the sound of KEF you'd also likely like the sound of IMF and Fried products. Cut from the same cloth. Fried was my gateway drug to KEF and IMF.
I like the German Car comparison
To be fair, I went looking for the bad things, so I'm not sure that's an indication of just how bad/prevalent the problem is. They seem to have sold a ton of those speakers over the years and there are bound to be issues over 30 years or more. I did find a KEF/speaker place in Florida that can do a "custom in-house tweeter replacement" at a high cost (165). Wouldn't seem justified if I spent 100 on a set to start, but if that's a worst case scenario it's better than dumping the speakers for parts if they go bad. And, if someone is doing that, then it's likely other shops are doing it also (there were a LOT of those speakers out there).
Sound is so good though, that it's worth a bit of hassle. To my ears, their speakers just work so well with my NAD amps!